J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek" sequel gets a weird title

[StarFuryG7]

Over at Blastr:

J.J. Abrams' Star Trek sequel gets an officially weird title

As Star Trek celebrates its 46th birthday (the original series premiered on September 8th, 1966), we've finally gotten wind of the title for the upcoming movie known until now as Star Trek 2.

MORE: blastr.com/2012/09/star-trek-2-gets-an-offic.php

[TrekBeatTK]

I am so glad that we can stop referring to it as Star Trek 2. At least we know none of them are that stupid.

I kinda like using Trek as a verb again. It's a bit of an odd title, but could definitely be worse. It's evocative without telling us anything though, like many of the other Trek titles.

It's also the second film to have no colon/subtitle (if we count Star Trek Generations that way). ...Wait, do we count Generations that way? I've seen it listed both ways, and the onscreen title doesn't clear it up any.

Anyway, I'm cautiously curious.

-TK