|
|
Post by StarFuryG7 on Mar 11, 2013 16:25:18 GMT -5
Spoiler > > >
I thought the choice of Rose McGowan to play young Cora in last night's episode was perfect casting, and I started laughing at the very end when Regina sneered at Snow and said to her--again--"You did this!" It was pretty damn funny.
It's such a corny show.
|
|
|
|
Post by StarFuryG7 on Apr 22, 2013 1:33:44 GMT -5
Emilie de Ravin has put on weight since last year.
|
|
|
|
Post by CRAMBAM on Apr 22, 2013 12:55:39 GMT -5
Maybe--they don't really focus on her like that the way they do say, Red.
|
|
|
|
Post by StarFuryG7 on Apr 23, 2013 1:54:26 GMT -5
Maybe--they don't really focus on her like that the way they do say, Red. I have a very keen eye when it comes to attractive gals. As I've said before, I notice these things. |
|
|
|
Post by StarFuryG7 on Oct 12, 2013 12:02:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by CRAMBAM on Oct 13, 2013 11:12:53 GMT -5
Talk about life imitating art.
What's amazing about that, is that if they have a kid, that kid will owe its existence to a couple of guys creating a TV show.
|
|
|
|
Post by StarFuryG7 on Oct 13, 2013 20:40:53 GMT -5
I think what he loves the most about her is her rack. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by CRAMBAM on Oct 14, 2013 8:18:55 GMT -5
Goodwin never really did it for me. I'm a huge Megan Ory fan, and I actually like the Blue Fairy too on that show.
|
|
|
|
Post by TrekBeatTK on Oct 14, 2013 10:47:22 GMT -5
I like me some Ginnifer Goodwin, though the pixie haircut doesn't do it for me. I almost saw "He's Just Not That Into You" just for her.
I haven't seen any of this season's OUAT yet.
-TK
|
|
|
|
Post by StarFuryG7 on Oct 14, 2013 12:37:28 GMT -5
Goodwin never really did it for me.  Yeah, I think we all figured that out given that you put a photo of her in character up here.and I actually like the Blue Fairy too on that show. That's Keegan Connor Tracy. She's been around for quite some time. She had a guest role in "Seven Days" when she was younger, had a small role in SFC's "Battlestar Galactica", and was a regular in "Jake 2.0", along with having had a recurring role in the first season of "Bates Motel" on A&E. It's amazing more people aren't familiar with her after all this time. |
|
|
|
Post by CRAMBAM on Oct 14, 2013 18:18:56 GMT -5
I guess I never noticed until this show.
|
|
|
|
Post by StarFuryG7 on Oct 14, 2013 18:36:28 GMT -5
I'm a little surprised that no one has commented on the elephant in the room.Have we become so complacent about this not so subtle attempt at mass brainwashing in the entertainment medium that we no longer even see fit to comment about this stuff? This is supposed to be a family friendly show for cryin' out loud.
|
|
|
|
Post by CRAMBAM on Oct 14, 2013 20:24:46 GMT -5
I guess they weren't so open about it, and it meant so little to the story that no one cared.
|
|
|
|
Post by TrekBeatTK on Oct 14, 2013 21:26:57 GMT -5
I'm a little surprised that no one has commented on the elephant in the room.Have we become so complacent about this not so subtle attempt at mass brainwashing in the entertainment medium that we no longer even see fit to comment about this stuff? This is supposed to be a family friendly show for cryin' out loud. Yeah, but the "progressive" family WANTS to indoctrinate its children like this as early as possible. That's why we have babies raised without gender and 7 year old trans- kids in girl scouts and all manor of fringe elements being treated as equally "normal". I fear this brave new world because to me its a dangerous social experiment and there's no knowing what effects it will have on this generation twenty to thirty years form now. ...We could use a Michael Apted-style documentary series to chronicle kids growing up in this new world. It is NOT progressive; it is TRANSgressive. Oh, and this is awful for Once Upon a Time because we not only have Mulan as a useless character and a token Asian, she is now the token lesbian too. (why are the gay characters so often racial minorities too?) The show doesn't need the character at all. I'm also kind of offended at the idea that because she wears a man's armor she must be homosexual. This trite reductive look at homosexual behavior may make them seem more acceptable, but only puts them in boxes to make them easily identifiable and categorized from a distance, regardless of how that effects straight people who do the same. Joan of Arc may have been an insane cross-dresser, but she was no lesbian. Why must Mulan be reduced to one? Considering the main theme of this series is the power of true love, I wonder how much of this came from pressure from GLAAD or other LGBT groups. Or even from the ABC execs, as ABC tends to be one of the more frequently praised networks by GLAAD. I so hope they don't pursue this idea on the show; I already dislike Mulan, and I love Aurora. Please don't sully that! oh, and it's always lesbians, isn't it? Somehow making them pretty girls makes it more palatable, is that it? -TK |
|
